Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8900065
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T01:00:55+00:00 2026-06-15T01:00:55+00:00

I always romoving ‘current’ class of all siblings then add ‘current’ class to my

  • 0

I always romoving ‘current’ class of all siblings then add ‘current’ class to my clicked one. I want to know will it be faster only removing ‘current’ class of which has ‘current’.seems to be a simple question, but I really want to know.

enter image description here

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T01:00:57+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 1:00 am

    Yes, filtering the query to a smaller set of elements will perform faster, because there are less elements to check.

    In modern browsers, jQuery will use native methods to query the DOM, so adding the selector has a negligible performance impact.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I always read that one reason to chose a RESTful architecture is (among others)
We always alloc before init in Objective C, then while writing init method, Why
i want to make application is always run in background even when we pulled
I've always heard that when you use absolute positioning that the element you want
I have a website I want to take that always has the same section
I always seen on SyncLock examples people using Private Lock1 As New Object '
I always wanted to implement swypable tabs in my application, like the ones in
I always thought that you could use OR in a LIKE statment to query
You always read that for-in loops should check o.hasOwnProperty(k) to skip over Object.prototype. Well,
People always talk about how objects created without the new keyword are destroyed when

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.