Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6740623
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T11:37:41+00:00 2026-05-26T11:37:41+00:00

I always thought that acegi security is the same as spring security 3.0… but

  • 0

I always thought that acegi security is the same as spring security 3.0… but It seems to be wrong.

Unfortunately I was unable to find any acegi security docs.

I need to have an anonymous user with special role assigned into Security Context what I found about that was this.

But there’s no AnonymousAuthenticationFilter in ACEGI – only AnonymousProcessingFilter. But how should I call it’s id?

I tried this code:

<bean id="anonymousAuthFilter"
      class="net.sf.acegisecurity.providers.anonymous.AnonymousProcessingFilter">
    <property name="key" value="foobar"/>
    <property name="userAttribute" value="anonymousUser,ROLE_ANONYMOUS"/>
</bean>

<bean id="anonymousAuthenticationProvider"
      class="net.sf.acegisecurity.providers.anonymous.AnonymousAuthenticationProvider">
    <property name="key" value="foobar"/>
</bean>

But I get nothing in my Security Context before I actually login. And that’s bad=(

Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T11:37:41+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:37 am

    acegi security is the old name of spring security. (in 2.0 or older I can’t remember, it is to long ago)

    I strongly recommend to use Spring Security 3.0. Attention: The Package Names and Jar Structure was Changed between Spring Security 3.0 und Spring Security 2.0.

    So if you have current documentation you will need to translate it back to 2.0. This Blog Spring Security 3.0.0.M1 Released describe the changes.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I always thought that parentheses improved readability, but in my textbook there is a
I've always thought that Python's advantages are code readibility and development speed, but time
I've always thought that server-side code is unaffected by the browser requesting it, but
I always thought that jinja was better because of template extending.. but them I've
I always thought that Predef.println was merely a shortcut for System.out.println , but apparently
I have always thought that using -1 in a condition is alway the same
I always thought base.Something was equivalent to ((Parent)this).Something , but apparently that's not the
I always thought that if you didn't implement a heartbeat, there was no way
I always thought that when you dropped a control onto an .aspx page that
I always thought that internal class has access to all data in its external

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.