Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7727413
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T05:27:10+00:00 2026-06-01T05:27:10+00:00

I am a C programmer (on linux), but now I have a project on

  • 0

I am a C programmer (on linux), but now I have a project on C++, and have a question.

Here is sample code

g_action.sa_sigaction = (void(*)(int,siginfo_t*,void*))&FlashWork::Disconnect_action; 

When I try to compile this on x86, it works fine, but on arm I get the following error

error: converting from void (FlashWork::*)(int, siginfo_t*, void*) to void (*)(int, siginfo_t*, void*)

What am I doing wrong?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T05:27:12+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 5:27 am

    “Pointer to members” are not compatible with “pointers to functions”, unless it’s a static member. The reason is that a pointer to member needs an object (a FlashWork object) in your case.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have few years of exp on linux, mainly ubuntu (dual-boot). Now i am
I'm an experienced Linux programmer, familiar with POSIX, stdio.h and so on, but totally
I'm a C programmer with lots of server code experience (AIX, HPUX, some Linux)
A programmer on your team is great at maintaining the old legacy system. But
Scenario: Programmer creates a branch for project 'foo' called 'my_foo' at revision 5 Programmer
Scala programmer should have known that this sort of writing : class Person{ var
I have a programmer who is using VB and LINQ; and I have a
I'm a Linux Python programmer with a (long) past Java experience I need a
I'm a C/C++ programmer with good windows and linux development experience and I also
I've written a C-app on Linux, but I didn't know about make to auto

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.