Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 648215
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T21:48:28+00:00 2026-05-13T21:48:28+00:00

I am a threading noob and I am trying to write a custom thread

  • 0

I am a threading noob and I am trying to write a custom thread safe generic list class in C# (.NET 3.5 SP1). I’ve read Why are thread safe collections so hard?. After reviewing the requirements of the class I think I only need to safely add to the list and return the list. The example shows pretty much all I want except it lacks the return list method therefore I’ve written my own public method like below:

Update: based on suggestions given I’ve reviewed my requirements and therefore simplified the class to as below:

public sealed class ThreadSafeList<T>
{
    private readonly IList<T> list = new List<T>();
    private readonly object lockable = new object();

    public void Add(T t)
    {
        lock (lockable)
        {
            list.Add(t);
        }
    }

    public IList<T> GetSnapshot()
    {
        IList<T> result;
        lock (lockable)
        {
            result = new List<T>(list);
        }
        return result;
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T21:48:28+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:48 pm

    Agree with @jrista. There’s a semantics issue you need to resolve, and why is it called Translate()? What is the intent?

    A – current code – return a read-only wrapper of the internal list

    return new ReadOnlyCollection<T>(list);
    

    You still have threading issues if the original list is changed if another thread is iterating over the list. As long as you’re aware of this, it isn’t a huge issue.

    B – a read-only copy.

    return new List<T>(list).AsReadOnly();
    

    This list has no threading issues because nothing modifies the new list. The only reference held is by the ReadOnlyCollection<T> wrapper.

    C – a normal (writable) copy

    return new List<T>(list);
    

    Returns a new list, and the caller can do what they wish to their list without affecting the original list, and changes to the original list do not affect this list.


    Does it matter if another consumer grabs a copy of the list and then modifies their copy? Do consumers need to see changes to the list? Do you just need a thread-safe enumerator?

    public IEnumerator<T> ThreadSafeEnumerator()
    {
        List<T> copy;
        lock(lockable)
            copy = new List<T>(list);
    
        foreach (var value in copy)
            yield return value;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

System.Threading.Thread.Name is a write-once property. I can assign to it at once, and only
I'm new to threading and I came accross a custom thread pool implementation example
The System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherObject class (which DependencyObject is based on) contains a useful function, called CheckAccess()
The following code using System.Threading; class Test { volatile int counter = 0; public
I'm a noob when it comes to threading in C#, and I'm not sure
ah i'm very noob in Thread Programming and just started a basic step to
I've implemented some threading into a project I've been working on in another thread,
Intel's Threading Building Blocks (TBB) open source library looks really interesting. Even though there's
Im using asynchronous threading in my application WITH httpClient. I make a call using
The documentation of System.Threading.Timer says that I should keep a live reference for it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.