Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8232637
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T17:54:00+00:00 2026-06-07T17:54:00+00:00

I am able to replicate my issue with a very simple case.. Explanation I

  • 0

I am able to replicate my issue with a very simple case..
Explanation
I have a very simple table my_table with one column column1.

create table my_table (column1 varchar(58));

I have few values for this column, NULL is also one of them.

insert into my_table (column1) values ('value1'), ('value1'), ('value2'), (null), ('value2');

Problem
When I try to query for group by column1 It is giving expected results by grouping all NULLs together. However if I add a where clause on column1 something like

select count(1) as value_count, column1 from my_table where column1 <> 'value1' group by column1;

It is ignoring both value1 and NULL where I was expecting to ignore only value1.

With this simple case I could get a workaround for this by adding an OR condition, But it is a real pain to add this condition all over in my original case.

Could someone can explain me better why this behavior and how can I fix this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T17:54:02+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 5:54 pm

    This is because any comparison with a NULL does not produce a true or false result, but instead produces a NULL result. Consequently, the condition column1 <> 'value1' evaluates as NULL where column1 is NULL, and so NULL values are not selected.

    You can get around this by using a function such as coalesce to test column1 – like so:

    select count(1) as value_count, column1 
    from my_table 
    where coalesce(column1,'') <> 'value1' 
    group by column1;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been able to have JPA/Hibernate to replicate the ON DELETE CASCADE functionality successfully
I have a production issue that I can't replicate in the development or test
UPDATE -- process to replicate issue: 1) Create a website project at c:\projects\restart-demo 2)
I want to be able to replicate only the folder structure (not the contents)
Not able to store all binary data values into sqlite3 table using QT. For
So I am trying to replicate Facebook's picture tagging functionality, and I have the
I have a USB device that I need to be able to talk to
So, I want to be able to replicate the effect seen on bing.com. When
I have an administrative application that I would like to be able to discover
Interlocked.Increment seems like among the most standard/simple of operations one would need to perform

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.