Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 50487
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:36:04+00:00 2026-05-10T16:36:04+00:00

I am already excited about document databases and especially about CouchDB’s simplicity. But I

  • 0

I am already excited about document databases and especially about CouchDB’s simplicity. But I have a hard time understanding if such databases are a viable option for multi user systems. Since those systems require some kind of relations between records which document databases do not provide.

Is it completely the wrong tool for such cases? Or some tagging and temporary views are the way to accomplish this? Or else…

UPDATE:
I understand the answers so far. But let me rephrase the question a bit. Lets say I have a load of semi-structured data which is normally a fit for CouchDB. I can tag them like ‘type=post’ and ‘year=2008’. My question is how far can I go with this type of tagging? Say can I create an array field with 10.000 names in it? Or is there a better way of doing this? It is a matter of understanding how to think in this document based sense.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:36:04+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:36 pm

    There was a discussion on the mailing list awhile back that fits this question fairly well. The rule of thumb was to only store data in a document that is likely to change vs. grow. If the data is more likely to grow then you most likely want to store separate docs.

    So in the case of a multi-user system one way of implementing ACL based permissions could be to create ‘permission docs’ that would be a mapping of user_id to doc_id with the appropriate permission indicated.

    {     _id: 'permission_doc_1',     type: 'acl',     user: 'John',     docid: 'John's Account Info',     read: true,     write: true } 

    And your views would be something along the lines of

    function(doc) {     emit([doc.user, doc.docid], {'read': doc.read, 'write': doc.write}); } 

    And given a docid and userid, checking for permissions would be:

    http://localhost:5984/db/_view/permissions/all?key=['John', 'John's Account Info'] 

    Obviously, this would require having some intermediary between the client and couch to make sure permissions were enforced.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I already have installed this gem: googlecharts.rubyforge.org, but I don't want to require it
I already have my program compiling on the linux gcj, but i'd like to
I already have this piece of functioning code, but after writing it I did
I already have a deploy.rb that can deploy my app on my production server.
We already have things like static analysis that tells us what's wrong with our
I already asked this question at the JOS-.NET board but Joel is closing that
I already know how to catch standard output of a console window, BUT my
I already know that BO was bought up by SAP on the cheap, but
I already spent some time developing small projects with the GWT and I recently
I already added the microsoft reference in. But basically what I want to do

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.