Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 671477
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:22:40+00:00 2026-05-14T00:22:40+00:00

I am always confused about return a string literal or a string from a

  • 0

I am always confused about return a string literal or a string from a function. I was told that there might be memory leak because you don’t know when the memory will be deleted?

For example, in the code below, how to implement foo() so as to make the output of the code is “Hello World”?

void foo (       )              // you can add parameters here.
{

}

int main ()
{
    char *c;
    foo (    );
    printf ("%s",c);
    return 0;
}

Also, if the return type of foo() is not void, but you can return char*, what should it be?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:22:41+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:22 am

    I’m assuming we cannot modify main. To get your program working without a leak, you need something to have static storage:

    void foo(char*& pC)  // reference
    {
        static char theString[] = "thingadongdong";
    
        pC = theString;
    }
    

    But really, this isn’t very conventional C++ code. You’d be using std::string and std::cout, so you don’t have to worry about memory:

    std::string foo(void)
    {
        return "better thingadongdong";
    }
    
    int main(void)
    {
        // memory management is done
        std::cout << foo() << std::endl;
    }
    

    If you’re wondering if something needs to be manually deallocated, it’s being done wrong.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am always confused about static variables, and the way memory allocation happens for
From this site: http://www.catalinzima.com/?page_id=14 I've always been confused about how the depth map is
I've always been confused about how the linker works, and it's a difficult subject
One thing that's always confused me is input escaping and whether or not you're
I'm confused about the difference between these two things: $env:path And function path {$env:path}
This has always confused me. It seems like this would be nicer: ["Hello", "world"].join("-")
I always use unix timestamps for everything, but am wondering if there is a
I am a little confused about how much I SHOULD do with properties. I
I always thought... overriding means reimplementing a function (same signature) in a base class
Just getting my head around Ruby metaprogramming. The mixin/modules always manage to confuse me.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.