Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6737237
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T11:13:31+00:00 2026-05-26T11:13:31+00:00

I am attempting to optimize a query where I want a close enough response.

  • 0

I am attempting to optimize a query where I want a “close enough” response.

I have two sets: A and B.

Set A contains 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8
Set B contains 1, 2, 3, 4

What I’d like to do is check B against A in such a way that it would tell me that 1 element is missing (4 in this case).

Is there a cleaner, more efficient way of doing this besides just going element by element and comparing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T11:13:32+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:13 am
    NSMutableSet *resultSet = [NSMutableSet setWithArray:B];
    NSSet *setA = [NSSet setWithArray:A];
    [resultSet minusSet:setA];
    Array *result = [resultSet allObjects];
    

    Reference : NSMutableSet

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a search query that I'm inheriting and attempting to optimize. I am
I'm attempting to optimize a T-SQL stored procedure I have. It's for pulling records
I have a Django query and some Python code that I'm trying to optimize
When attempting to call functions in math.h , I'm getting link errors like the
Attempting to set up Samba + OpenLDAP using nss_ldap. After joining Windows7 to Samba
So I'm attempting to optimize a product image carousel which cycles through items as
I have been attempting to implement a custom dojo build to replace the dojo
Attempting what would appear to be a simple pre ajax-post validation against a short
I have written an OpenGL game and I want to allow remote playing of
I am attempting to optimise around a possible bottleneck. I have a server application

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.