Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6609389
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T19:42:45+00:00 2026-05-25T19:42:45+00:00

I am attempting to pattern match on a type in a case statement such

  • 0

I am attempting to pattern match on a type in a case statement such as the following:

result <- action
case result of
  Success _ -> do something
  Failure e -> case e of
                 MyException myField -> do take another action
                 _ -> ...

The compiler can’t deduce e ~ MyException which I understand. My question is what other information do I need to supply to the compiler to be able to match my exception type. In this particular case I know that if there is a Failure the returned type will be MyException.

EDIT:

The type of result (From the Aws package) is:
(Transaction r a, ConfigurationFetch (Info r)) =>
Configuration -> r -> IO (Response (ResponseMetadata a) a)

a is from Data.Attempt which is either a Success or Failure.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T19:42:45+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 7:42 pm

    Assuming you’re using extensible exceptions (which is the default in recent ghc’s), your result is probably something like

    data Result = Success MySuccess | Failure SomeException
    

    You need to convert the SomeException to your own exception type. This is done with the function toException :: Exception e => SomeException -> Maybe e. Then you would handle this like:

    Failure e -> case toException e of
                   Just (MyException myField) -> do take another action
                   _ -> ...
    

    Of course this is assuming that I’m right about your Result type.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am attempting to retrieve jpeg and jpg files using the following statement: string[]
In C#, I'm attempting to use the following capture pattern with a variable -
I am attempting to implement the Visitor Design Pattern using OCaml's OO constructs and
I'm attempting to replace a pattern in all my .aspx and .ascx file when
I'm continuing to struggle with the MVVM pattern and, in attempting to create a
I'm attempting to create a class with many parameters, using a Builder pattern rather
I'm attempting to extract a given pattern within a text file, however, the results
I'm attempting to implement a repository pattern with my poco objects auto generated from
I am working on some socket programming stuff and attempting to match some strings.
I'm attempting to make use of JAX-RS' (Jersey) MVC pattern. Attempts to reach http://localhost:8080/myproject/foos/test

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.