Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 988567
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T05:39:19+00:00 2026-05-16T05:39:19+00:00

i am building a class that inherits from List. Items are going to be

  • 0

i am building a class that inherits from List. Items are going to be added to this collection at runtime and what i want is to have this class automatically do something with each block of n items after they have been added.

So here is the scenario.

1] Create new class that inherits from List – CollectionX

2] At runtime we will be calling ColX.Add(T) many times

3] When ColX has 500 or more items it is to move them into a temporary area and do work on them, then delete them. Keeping in mind that all the while items will still be being added to ColX.

So i guess my question is how do i implement this nicely and by ensuring that it is thread safe.

The work that is to be performed must be done in blocks so i dont think a queue will work as you can only dequeue 1 item at a time.

I think im looking for more of a pattern than actual types or libraries.

Can anyone help?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T05:39:19+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:39 am

    Don’t let CollectionX inherit from List.

    Instead, use 2 Lists internally, Add() to 1 and process the other.

    This way you only have to lock the swapping of the Lists. If there are timing problems you could even use a 3rd List to prevent blockage.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.