Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4556898
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T17:25:54+00:00 2026-05-21T17:25:54+00:00

I am calling handler.postDelayed(runnable, time); handler.post(runnable2); Will the second runnable not get handled until

  • 0

I am calling

handler.postDelayed(runnable, time);
handler.post(runnable2);

Will the second runnable not get handled until the first message in the queue does, after “time” has passed?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T17:25:55+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 5:25 pm

    No. The second runnable will be posted immediately and would execute before the first — depending on the time parameter in the first, anyway. If you post the first with a negligible delay for time it’s possible it could execute first. I don’t believe there’s any guarantee in place that it wouldn’t.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I heard that calling a handler (delegate, etc.) in Objective-C can be even faster
I have a set of messages, that all derive from Message, and implement the
According to GObject reference g_signal_connect_swapped(instance, detailed_signal, c_handler, data); connects a GCallback function to a
Why might my GetRawData declared function return a correct value when called from my
In a FLEX app, I am trying to re-dispatch a custom event. I.e. component1
So, I've been playing around with the Boost asio functions and sockets (specifically the
I've written a multi-threaded WTL util to stress test an in-house service. Comms threads
I have implemented an IHttpAsyncHandler. I am making about 5 different AJAX calls from
In my application, I have two different activities and both are list activities. I
I'm trying to access a Page within an HttpModule and I think I should

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.