Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3314128
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:11:44+00:00 2026-05-17T22:11:44+00:00

I am checking some old SQL Statements for the purpose of documenting them and

  • 0

I am checking some old SQL Statements for the purpose of documenting them and probably enhancing them.

The DBMS is Oracle.

I did not understand a statement which read like this:

select ...
from a,b
where a.id=b.id(+)

I am confused about the (+) operator, and could not get it at any forums… (searching for + within quotes didn’t work either).

Anyway, I used ‘Explain Plan’ of SQLDeveloper and I got an output saying that HASH JOIN, RIGHT OUTER, etc.

Would there be any difference if I remove the (+) operator at the end of the query? Does the database have to satisfy some condition (like having some indexes, etc.) before (+) can be used?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:11:44+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:11 pm

    That’s Oracle specific notation for an OUTER JOIN, because the ANSI-89 format (using a comma in the FROM clause to separate table references) didn’t standardize OUTER joins.

    The query would be re-written in ANSI-92 syntax as:

       SELECT ...
         FROM a
    LEFT JOIN b ON b.id = a.id
    

    This link is pretty good at explaining the difference between JOINs.


    It should also be noted that even though the (+) works, Oracle recommends not using it:

    Oracle recommends that you use the FROM clause OUTER JOIN syntax rather than the Oracle join operator. Outer join queries that use the Oracle join operator (+) are subject to the following rules and restrictions, which do not apply to the FROM clause OUTER JOIN syntax:

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've seen some methods of checking if a PEFile is a .NET assembly by
I am trying to do some very simple form validation checking for null or
I just went through some MVC tutorials after checking this site out for a
Checking the HTML source of a question I see for instance: <a id=comments-link-xxxxx class=comments-link>add
I was checking out Intel's whatif site and their Transactional Memory compiler (each thread
I am just checking out F#, so apologies if this is a silly question,
I'm checking for existing of a row in in_fmd, and the ISBN I look
I'm checking out the Delphi 2009 Trial, but run into problems with the generics
I was checking Microsoft's Visual Studio page just now and in the advertisements sidebar
The code below is checking performance of three different ways to do same solution.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.