Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8297567
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T15:27:45+00:00 2026-06-08T15:27:45+00:00

I am confused over this because having a final field b of type B

  • 0

I am confused over this because having a final field b of type B inside an Object A just ensures that the field b can’t be instantiated again but the state of A can be still be changed by manipulating b internally or externally, so how does final serve the purpose immutablity here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T15:27:46+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 3:27 pm

    final helps to implement an immutable object. The immutable object must ensure that any objects it owns are themselves immutable or at least not publicly mutable.

    There is no royal path to immutability in Java (or otherwise, I may add).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Very confused over this. I've just started learning about pointers and have now decided
I am currently working with Python and have been confused over the fact that
I am little confused regarding this matter. I understand that VS had a SPA
I'm a bit confused because the logical/programmer brain in me says that if all
Ok, so I'm a little confused as to why I can't find this anywhere,
Having pored over the XML W3C Recommendation 1.0, I'm still confused regarding the general
I've been searching all over and just can't find a explanation or reason why
I am confused over getting and clearing when working in Microsoft C. Like when
I am a little confused over why people recommend you use: long rantime =
I'm a bit confused over the .net redistributables... Our C# code uses some API

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.