Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6614287
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T20:19:14+00:00 2026-05-25T20:19:14+00:00

I am creating a custom object and overriding the + operator. I am return

  • 0

I am creating a custom object and overriding the + operator. I am return a new object of the same type. Is it bad practise to allocate memory inside this method? because I then I will need to delete the memory out of scope.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T20:19:14+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 8:19 pm

    Yes, without further information, it is bad.

    Usually you do:

    struct X
    {
         int m_i;
         X(int i) : m_i(i) {  }
    
         X operator+(const X& another) const
         {
             return X(m_i + another.m_i); // note, not new X(...)
         }
    }
    

    That said, you could return a unique_ptr if you really had to allocate dynamically.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am creating a string array with values from a custom object, like this:
I'm new to creating custom object in JavaScript, so it could easily be something
hello creating a custom object may be a widely published topic, but my lack
So I'm creating a custom user control in .NET 2.0 and this user control
I am creating a custom message box for an application. My object is derived
I am creating my own custom object, and I am wondering if I need
I am creating custom html helper for my datepicker. i want to pass inside
So I'm creating a custom ActionFilter that's based mostly on this project http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/aspnet_mvc_restapi.aspx .
I'm struggling with this a bit... I'm creating a new NSMutableArray like so NSMutableArray
I'm creating a custom control called ImageFader. The style template looks like this: <ControlTemplate

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.