Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8733375
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T09:38:14+00:00 2026-06-13T09:38:14+00:00

I am creating an interface say ‘Car’ public interface Car { public void drive(int

  • 0

I am creating an interface say ‘Car’

public interface Car {
    public void drive(int Speed, int Gear ); // for cars which have gears
    public void drive(int Speed); // for cars which do not have gears
}

Now i am creating my implimentation classes say SimpleCar and AdvanceCar where

  • SimpleCar do not have gears
  • AdvanceCar have gears

Now when i write my implementation classes i am forced to code for both the methods even though i do not want them in my implementation classes

public class SimpleCar implements Car {
    public void drive(int Speed, int Gear ){ ... }; // dont want this method in SimpleCar
    public void drive(int Speed ){ ... };
}

can someone help me design my interface which has a method but the implementation classes have different signatures?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T09:38:15+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 9:38 am
    public interface Car {
    
        public void drive(int Speed, int Gear); // for cars which have gears
    
        public void drive(int Speed); // for cars which do not have gears
    }
    
    
    
    public class CarAdapter implements Car {
    
        @Override
        public void drive(int Speed, int Gear) {
            // TODO Auto-generated method stub
    
        }
    
        @Override
        public void drive(int Speed) {
            // TODO Auto-generated method stub
    
        }
    
    }
    
    
    public class AdvancedCar extends CarAdapter {
    
        @Override
        public void drive(int Speed) {
            // TODO Auto-generated method stub
            super.drive(Speed);
        }
    
        @Override
        public void drive(int Speed, int Gear) {
            // TODO Auto-generated method stub
            super.drive(Speed, Gear);
        }
    
    }
    
    
    public class SimpleCar extends CarAdapter {
    
        @Override
        public void drive(int Speed) {
            // TODO Auto-generated method stub
            super.drive(Speed);
        }
    
    
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have interface: public interface IFoo { int Bar1 { get; set;
Let's say I have a service whose interface is something like this: public interface
I am creating a web interface which currently reads data in from an XML
Let’s say I have a view controller, or a window controller, which is (as
Let's say I have a Concrete class with a Read-Only property e.g. public class
Let's say I wanted to define an interface which represents a call to a
I'm creating a user approval interface leveraging the .Net Membership class. I have a
The scenario goes like this - I have an assembly say 'MyAssembly'. An interface
I am creating a rails application, in which i have to create a tutorials
Say I have the following EJB (using ejb3): @Stateless(name=Queries) @Remote(Queries.class) @Local(Queries.class) public final class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.