Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8767457
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T16:49:05+00:00 2026-06-13T16:49:05+00:00

I am curious how to produce a distinct file list based on this example.

  • 0

I am curious how to produce a distinct file list based on this example.

** This example produces a list of all .ps1 and .psm1 files that contain the text "folders", but without the text ".invoke" on the same line.

$text='folders'
dir C:\Workspace\mydirectorytosearch1\ -recurse -filter '*.ps*1' | Get-ChildItem | select-string -pattern $text | where {$_ -NotLike '*.invoke(*'}
dir C:\Workspace\mydirectorytosearch2\ -recurse -filter '*.ps*1' | Get-ChildItem | select-string -pattern $text | where {$_ -NotLike '*.invoke(*'}

This is cool and works well but I get duplicate file output (same file but different line numbers).

How can I keep my file output distinct?

The current undesirable output:

  • C:\Workspace\mydirectorytosearch1\anonymize-psake.ps1:4:. "$($folders.example.test)\anonymize\Example.vars.ps1"
  • C:\Workspace\mydirectorytosearch1\anonymize-psake.ps1:5:. "$($folders.missles)\extract\build-utilities.ps1"

The desired output:

  • C:\Workspace\mydirectorytosearch1\anonymize-psake.ps1

Help me tweak my script??

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T16:49:06+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 4:49 pm

    You can eliminate duplicates wit Select-String and the Unique parameter:

    $text='folders'
    Get-ChildItem C:\Workspace\mydirectorytosearch1\,C:\Workspace\mydirectorytosearch2\ -Recurse -Filter '*.ps*1' |
    Select-String -Pattern $text | Where-Object {$_ -NotLike '*.invoke(*'} | 
    Select-Object Path -Unique
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Now this has no practical implications at all, but I am curious about this
This is a rather simple question that is making me a bit curious. Consider
Curious, what happens when you return keyword this from a struct in C#? For
Curious what "Toast" means? Saw this and am curious... Similar Posts How to add
Just curious. Using gcc/gdb under Ubuntu 9.10. Reading a C book that also often
Out of pure interested, I'm curious how to create PI sequentially so that instead
I am curious what the best practice is. For example we have product entity,
I promise this isn't homework. I'm just a curious novice. How does this: function
Curious - why doesn't stat_summary produce any new variables? Would seems very useful to
Just curious: I have to do a mini-CMS that allows users to add pages

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.