Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1113995
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T02:56:27+00:00 2026-05-17T02:56:27+00:00

I am currently building an XML schema, with a head, a body, and potentially

  • 0

I am currently building an XML schema, with a head, a body, and potentially errors. I am dividing those three parts into different namespaces, so I’m wondering where and when I should put the URI namespace declarations in.

For example, should it be:

<head:schema xmlns:head="http://mywebsite.com/ns/head/" xmnls:body="http://mywebsite.com/ns/body/" xmlns:error="http://mywebsite.com/ns/error/">
    <head:Response>
       <head:MyFunctionResponse>
          <body:DataObject>
              <body:Parameter>Foo</body:Parameter>
              <body:Parameter>Bar</body:Parameter>
          </body:DataObject>
       </head:MyFunctionResponse>
    </head:Response>
</head:schema>

So despite there being no “error” namespace in this particular document, it is still defined, so that when the “body” namespace is replaced by an “error” namespace, <schema> stays the same.

Or should it be more like this?

<head:schema>
    <head:Response xmlns:head="http://mywebsite.com/ns/head/">
       <head:MyFunctionResponse>
          <body:DataObject xmnls:body="http://mywebsite.com/ns/body/">
              <body:Parameter>Foo</body:Parameter>
              <body:Parameter>Bar</body:Parameter>
          </body:DataObject>
       </head:MyFunctionResponse>
    </head:Response>
</head:schema>

OR

<head:schema>
    <head:Response xmlns:head="http://mywebsite.com/ns/head/">
       <head:MyFunctionResponse>
          <error:ThrownException xmnls:body="http://mywebsite.com/ns/error/">
              <error:Id>21</error:Id>
              <error:Message>Something went wrong.</error:Message>
          </error:ThrownException>
       </head:MyFunctionResponse>
    </head:Response>
</head:schema>

where the namespace is only declared just as it is needed.

Or is this a question of style, opinion, or preference. Like “Window seat, or aisle seat?”.

If it’s not style, opinion, or preference, what are the guiding ideas behind the placement of the namespaces?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T02:56:28+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:56 am

    Put them all at the top. You aren’t saving anything by putting them closer to their use.

    Or, put them where they are used, and then make them the default namespace so you can save a bunch of clutter:

    <schema>
        <Response xmlns="http://mywebsite.com/ns/head/">
           <MyFunctionResponse>
              <DataObject xmnls="http://mywebsite.com/ns/body/">
                  <Parameter>Foo</Parameter>
                  <Parameter>Bar</Parameter>
              </DataObject>
           </MyFunctionResponse>
        </Response>
    </schema>
    

    BTW: It’s odd that your root element (schema) is un-namespaced.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My code is currently building with no errors. It is searching in an xml
I'm currently building an XSD to validate some XML I'm working on, I'm guessing
I'm currently building large xml files with xml.dom.minidom and then writing them out to
I am currently building a XML based Jasper Report in which I am trying
I'm currently building a Java app that could end up being run on many
I am currently building in Version 3.5 of the .Net framework and I have
I am currently building an internal web application used in a factory/warehouse type location.
We're currently building an application that executes a number of external tools. We often
I'm currently building a small web application that includes a fair amount of JavaScript.
I am currently building an Excel 2007 Add-in using VSTO (latest version + sp1)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.