Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3595938
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T19:55:06+00:00 2026-05-18T19:55:06+00:00

I am currently learning ASM by disassembling some of C codes. One thing interested

  • 0

I am currently learning ASM by disassembling some of C codes. One thing interested me is that the gcc compiler generates code like this

movq %rax,%rax

which is obviously meaningless. So what is the purpose of doing that?

I am wondering if it is used for waste a few cycles of CPU in order to improve the pipeline?

Thank you for your hint!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T19:55:07+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 7:55 pm

    It is basically a no-op, yes.

    The compiler does this because branching to an address aligned on a 4-byte boundary is faster than branching to an unaligned address. So if you have a loop, the compiler will insert “padding” just before the start of it in order to get it into alignment.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am currently learning ASM by disassembling some of C codes. One thing interested
im currently learning python (in the very begining), so I still have some doubts
I am currently learning Javascript, and I'd like to create my own Lorem Ipsum
I am currently learning C, and am having some issues with trying to make
Ohai, I'm currently trying to implement an 8086 ASM debugger for learning purposes. Until
I'm currently learning how to code using MIPS and the QTSPIM emulator. I thought
Currently learning Scheme/Racket and have problem running this piece of code. (if (or (<
Im currently learning multiple inheritance and ran into a problem creating a function that
I'm currently learning to program in C. In one of the tasks in my
I'm currently learning about JSF 2.0 and i would like to ask about how

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.