Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5951547
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T17:33:10+00:00 2026-05-22T17:33:10+00:00

I am currently working developing a C++-based module for Python. I have found that

  • 0

I am currently working developing a C++-based module for Python. I have found that Boost::Python is working quite well for what I want to accomplish. However, I am now running into some issues with the docstring that is being generated by Boost::Python. Given the following Boost::Python definitions:

BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(gcsmt)
{
class_<gcsmt::Units>("Units", "Sets the units used as input.", no_init)
    .def("PrintSupported", &gcsmt::Units::printSupported, "Print out all supported units.")
    .def("SetDefault", &gcsmt::Units::setDefaultUnit, "Sets the default unit to be used for inputs/outputs.")
    .staticmethod("PrintSupported")
    .staticmethod("SetDefault")
    .def(self_ns::str(self_ns::self))
    ;
}

If I compile, load my module in Python, and get help on the gscmt.Units class, the output is the following:

>>> help(gcsmt.Units)

Help on class Units in module gcsmt:

class Units(Boost.Python.instance)
 |  Sets the units used as input.
 |  
 |  Method resolution order:
 |      Units
 |      Boost.Python.instance
 |      __builtin__.object
 |  
 |  Methods defined here:
 |  
 |  __reduce__ = <unnamed Boost.Python function>(...)
 |  
 |  __str__(...)
 |      __str__( (Units)arg1) -> object :
 |      
 |          C++ signature :
 |              _object* __str__(gcsmt::Units {lvalue})
 |  
 |  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 |  Static methods defined here:
 |  
 |  PrintSupported(...)
 |      PrintSupported() -> None :
 |          Print out all supported units.
 |      
 |          C++ signature :
 |              void PrintSupported()
 |  
 |  SetDefault(...)
 |      SetDefault( (UnitType)arg1, (str)arg2) -> None :
 |          Sets the default unit to be used for inputs/outputs.
 |      
 |          C++ signature :
 |              void SetDefault(gcsmt::unitType,std::string)
 |  
 |  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 |  Data and other attributes defined here:
 |  
 |  __init__ = <built-in function __init__>
 |      Raises an exception
 |      This class cannot be instantiated from Python
 |  
 |  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 |  Data descriptors inherited from Boost.Python.instance:
 |  
 |  __dict__
 |  
 |  __weakref__
 |  
 |  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 |  Data and other attributes inherited from Boost.Python.instance:
 |  
 |  __new__ = <built-in method __new__ of Boost.Python.class object>
 |      T.__new__(S, ...) -> a new object with type S, a subtype of T

While much of the documentation being output is valuable to me as a developer, most of it would be noise, or even worse, confusing, to an end user. (E.g.- my users don’t care what the C++ signature of a given method is, nor do they need to see the Method resolution order, or additional hidden methods that are shown). Is there any way to override, and reduce the level/verbosity of the documentation set up by Boost::Python? Ideally, I’d like my documentation to look something like:

>>> help(gcsmt.Units)

Help on class Units in module gcsmt:

class Units
 |  Sets the units used as input.
 |  
 |  PrintSupported() -> None :
 |      Print out all supported units.
 |  
 |  SetDefault( (UnitType)arg1, (str)arg2) -> None :
 |      Sets the default unit to be used for inputs/outputs.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T17:33:11+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 5:33 pm
    • Use the boost::python::docstring_options class to define your auto-created docstring options.
    • All def functions take a docstring as the last parameter.
    • All class_ definitions take the class docstring as the last parameter

    I.e.:

    using boost::python;
    BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(foo)
    {
      // This will enable user-defined docstrings and python signatures,
      // while disabling the C++ signatures
      docstring_options local_docstring_options(true, true, false);
    
      class_<Bar>("Bar", init<>(), "Bar class" /* class docstring here */ )
        .def("foobar", &Bar::foobar, "foobar function" /* function docstring here */);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm currently working on a consumer mobile application project and have read that 40%
I'm currently working on an app that works with Twitter, but while developing/testing (especially
I'm currently working with C# and developing a few Silverlight applications that use sharepoint
I'm working on a browser based app, currently I'm developing and styling for the
Currently I'm developing a dashboard for the company that I'm working for. The functionality
I'm currently working on my Bachelors dissertation. This involves developing a software product and
SO. I'm working with the OCS UCCAPI, developing a custom OCS client. I'm currently
Currently working in the deployment of an OFBiz based ERP, we've come to the
Am currently working on an application that requires users to submit posts and comments
I`m currently working on a script, and I have the following situation. function somnicefunction()

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.