Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6936861
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T12:17:21+00:00 2026-05-27T12:17:21+00:00

I am doing a review with my professor’s lecture note. I got this question

  • 0

I am doing a review with my professor’s lecture note. I got this question when I reached the concurrency section:

in the slide, professor gave two examples of using pthread (one is good example and the other is bad.). But I dont understand why there is a difference between them.

here is the good example:

#include <stdio.h> 
#include <stdlib.h> 
#include <pthread.h> 
void *get_rand_num(void *args) { 
  int *nump = malloc(sizeof(int)); 
  srand(pthread_self()); 
  *nump = rand(); 
  return nump; 
} 
int main() { 
  pthread_t tid; 
  void *ptr = NULL; 
  pthread_create(&tid, NULL, get_rand_num, NULL); 
  pthread_join(tid, &ptr); 
  printf("Random number: %d\n", * (int *) ptr); 
  return 0; 
}

And the bad example is

#include <stdio.h> 
#include <stdlib.h> 
#include <pthread.h> 
void *get_rand_num(void *args) { 
  int num; 
  srand(pthread_self()); 
  num = rand(); 
  return &num; 
} 
int main() { 
  pthread_t tid; 
  void *ptr = NULL; 
  pthread_create(&tid, NULL, get_rand_num, NULL); 
  pthread_join(tid, &ptr); 
  printf("Random number: %d\n", * (int *) ptr); 
  return 0; 
}

Anyone can understand these two examples please explain to me why the bad one is different from the first one, and why it is not good?

Thank you

allan

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T12:17:22+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 12:17 pm

    The bad example returns a pointer to a local variable. This is always a bad idea, because local variables die when the function returns. This is no problem specific to multi-threaded programs, but aggravated because threads get one stack per thread, which is deallocated after the pthread_join. While you often get lucky in single-threaded programming and can use the pointer immediately after the function’s return, the whole segment containing the old thread’s stack might have gone back to the operating system in the bad example and accesses would produce segmentation faults.

    The first example is also not very good since it produces a memory leak.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I hope this question is on topic. I was doing code review and stumbled
I stumbled upon this while doing a review and the author is not available:
i am doing a review of clueTip . i see this can be used
I've been doing some code review and this code seemed weird to me since
I'm doing a review for our codebase, and there are many statements like this:
Thanks for taking time to review this question. I've been trying to fix a
Doing a code review I've stumbled over GWM in Java-Spring-GWT web-application. As this product
I've been doing code review (mostly using tools like FindBugs) of one of our
I'm doing code review and came across a class that uses all static methods.
We are currently doing a review of our WCF service design and one thing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.