Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6979723
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T17:55:20+00:00 2026-05-27T17:55:20+00:00

I am doing some performance tests and noticed that a LINQ expression like result

  • 0

I am doing some performance tests and noticed that a LINQ expression like

result = list.First(f => f.Id == i).Property

is slower than

result = list.Where(f => f.Id == i).First().Property

This seems counter intuitive. I would have thought that the first expression would be faster because it can stop iterating over the list as soon as the predicate is satisfied, whereas I would have thought that the .Where() expression might iterate over the whole list before calling .First() on the resulting subset. Even if the latter does short circuit it should not be faster than using First directly, but it is.

Below are two really simple unit tests that illustrate this. When compiled with optimisation on TestWhereAndFirst is about 30% faster than TestFirstOnly on .Net and Silverlight 4. I have tried making the predicate return more results but the performance difference is the same.

Can any one explain why .First(fn) is slower than .Where(fn).First()? I see a similar counter intuitive result with .Count(fn) compared to .Where(fn).Count().

private const int Range = 50000;

private class Simple
{
   public int Id { get; set; }
   public int Value { get; set; }
}

[TestMethod()]
public void TestFirstOnly()
{
   List<Simple> list = new List<Simple>(Range);
   for (int i = Range - 1; i >= 0; --i)
   {
      list.Add(new Simple { Id = i, Value = 10 });
   }

   int result = 0;
   for (int i = 0; i < Range; ++i)
   {
      result += list.First(f => f.Id == i).Value;
   }

   Assert.IsTrue(result > 0);
}

[TestMethod()]
public void TestWhereAndFirst()
{
   List<Simple> list = new List<Simple>(Range);
   for (int i = Range - 1; i >= 0; --i)
   {
      list.Add(new Simple { Id = i, Value = 10 });
   }

   int result = 0;
   for (int i = 0; i < Range; ++i)
   {
      result += list.Where(f => f.Id == i).First().Value;
   }

   Assert.IsTrue(result > 0);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T17:55:21+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 5:55 pm

    I got the same results: where+first was quicker than first.

    As Jon noted, Linq uses lazy evaluation so the performance should be (and is) broadly similar for both methods.

    Looking in Reflector, First uses a simple foreach loop to iterate through the collection but Where has a variety of iterators specialised for different collection types (arrays, lists, etc.). Presumably this is what gives Where the small advantage.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We are doing some performance tests on our website and we are getting the
While doing some JavaScript performance tests I came up with the following piece of
I was doing some performance metrics and I ran into something that seems quite
I have a webapp that I am in the middle of doing some load/performance
doing this: new WindsorContainer() takes 4 seconds, sometimes 7 I did some performance tests
I am doing some performance tests using .Net 3.5 against SQL Server. I am
I am currently doing some performance tests on Hibernate / Hibernate.Search with Lucene in
Using SQL Server 2005. This is something I've noticed while doing some performance analysis.
We're doing some prototyping of a new app and noticed that one of the
I am doing some performance work in my unit tests and wondering if it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.