Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 904245
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:01:04+00:00 2026-05-15T16:01:04+00:00

I am doing something that is probably silly, but it would be nice if

  • 0

I am doing something that is probably silly, but it would be nice if it worked.

I am attempting to specialize types in a way that I need my own lookup structure that is essentially global (but ideally encapsulated as a class variable), but I want the objects to be type safe, so they are parameterized.

Consequently, I have, essentially

template<class T, int N>
class SpecialArray
{
//...
private:
   static map<string, internal_t> lookupTable
}

and for whatever reason, I didn’t think until such time as I went to initialize lookupTable
that when I say

template <class T, int N>
SpecialArray<T,N>::lookupTable;

there are going to be many different lookupTables running around attached to the various instantiations of SpecialArray.

I suspect it may just be a pipe dream and that the correct answer is just making it a separate global singleton object, but is there anyway to make it such that there is just one lookupTable for all the SpecialArrays?

Like, in the C++ in my mind (which is not real C++), this would go something like

template <class T, int N>
SpecialArray<*,*>::lookupTable;

… but sadly GCC does not compile the C++ in my mind

Is there any actual way to get what I want (somewhere in C++0x-land or something)? I am likely to run into this problem also with some static methods that manipulate this lookup table (which does not keep track of types or Ns).

… sorry if that didn’t make any sense.

Thanks in advance for any help or sympathy you can render.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:01:04+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:01 pm

    You could add a non-templated base class and move lookupTable into that class:

    class Base
    {
    protected:
        static map<string, internal_t> lookupTable
    };
    
    template<class T, int N>
    class SpecialArray : Base
    {
        //...
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm probably doing something silly, but here it goes. I'm trying to get the
Not that I'm doing something like that, but I am kind of interested how
I'm doing something like zgrep somepattern access_log.X.gz But I find that a lot of
I am having trouble doing something that is probably pretty simple! I have a
Probably I'm doing something wrong but here it goes: I'm trying to create a
I'm probably doing something stupid but I just can't seem to get the permissions
Usually I was doing something like that (just a example): using (Stream xmlStream =
I have a Windows C++ program that is doing something like: FILE* pf =
I was doing some performance metrics and I ran into something that seems quite
I hope this is something straightforward that I'm doing wrong. I saw something online

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.