Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6863615
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T02:48:18+00:00 2026-05-27T02:48:18+00:00

I am finding that the more semantic I make my HTML using the new

  • 0

I am finding that the more semantic I make my HTML using the new HTML 5 tags the easier it is to style and work with the document. I am new to HTML 5 and only a HTML novice but I want to make my HTML 5 as semantically correct as possible. Currently I have my HTML 5 footer divided like so.

    <footer>
        <section>
            <h2>Contact</h2>
            <ul>
                <li><a href="snip">Email</a></li>
                <li><a href="snip">Tweet</a></li>
            </ul>
        </section>
        <section>
            <h2>Explore</h2>
            <ul>
                <li><a href="snip">Stack Overflow</a></li>
                <li><a href="snip">LinkedIn</a></li>
                <li><a href="snip">Flickr</a></li>
                <li><a href="snip">Google+</a></li>
            </ul>
        </section>
        <section>
            <h2>About</h2>
            <p>
               snip
            </p>
        </section>
    </footer>

The particular tags I am querying are section and use of the h2 tag. I would think section is more semantically correct that aside or article as each section of the footer is, well, a section. The h2 is also a concern to me. I would like to use H1 as it is the first heading in the section but I am afraid the google spider will shun me and keep me from making web friends if I use h1 over h2.

Thoughts from people who have worked with semantics are very much appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T02:48:18+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 2:48 am

    You may want to add the address-tag around your contact information:

    <footer>
        <section>
            <h1>Contact</h1>
            <address>
                <ul>
                    <li><a href="snip">Email</a></li>
                    <li><a href="snip">Tweet</a></li>
                </ul>
            </address>
        </section>
        <section>
            <h1>Explore</h1>
            <ul>
                <li><a href="snip">Stack Overflow</a></li>
                <li><a href="snip">LinkedIn</a></li>
                <li><a href="snip">Flickr</a></li>
                <li><a href="snip">Google+</a></li>
            </ul>
        </section>
        <section>
            <h1>About</h1>
            <p>
               snip
            </p>
        </section>
    </footer>
    

    this would be semantically correct but watch out for older browsers which are having problems with the implementation of <address>. In Firefox 3.6.12 were no block-elements allowed to be placed inside <address> like discussed here.

    EDIT:
    Also change the <h2> to <h1>:

    Notice how the use of section means that the author can use h1 elements throughout, without having to worry about whether a particular section is at the top level, the second level, the third level, and so on.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm using IDebugSymbols::GetNameByOffset and I'm finding that I get the same symbol name for
I'm looking to learn LINQ, but I'm finding that there is a lot more
I am finding that performance degrades after one or more screen rotations, and I
I've moved an application to using ActiveResource and I'm finding that I need to
So I'm finding that the more I use Maven, the buggier I'm finding it
I'm finding that I can't access the admin shares on an XP64 box when
I keep finding that if I have nested divs inside each other, and one
I'm finding that hitting the Refresh button on my browser will temporarily screw up
I am actually finding that chkContactType.Items is empty when I step through the code.
I'm finding that with dynamic linking, even with SxS, Windows Update will come along

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.