Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7086111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T07:30:33+00:00 2026-05-28T07:30:33+00:00

I am following a MSDN article to understand the single ton design pattern. I

  • 0

I am following a MSDN article to understand the single ton design pattern. I have few questions with respect to the approach they followed.

IN THE SECOND APPROACH Static Initialization

  • it is not clear to me why this class was declared as sealed.
    why did they mark the private instance variable( instance ) as readonly ?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T07:30:33+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 7:30 am

    The class was not declared as static, but as sealed (other classes can’t subclass it). It’s done because the singleton implementation in question knows to instantiate only instances of this specific class.

    If you subclass it:
    public class Child: Singleton { ... }
    the Child class will still instantiate the base class:
    Child.Instance
    will still return instance of Singleton), which will result in confusing code.

    The readonly increases code readability and prevents mistakes in future modification of the class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Have tried following the advice in the MSDN article: How to: Customize Data Formatting
As per the following article, I have defined my service contract as http://blogs.msdn.com/b/endpoint/archive/2010/11/13/simplified-asynchronous-programming-model-in-wcf-with-async-await.aspx [ServiceContract]
I'm building a Windows service and following this MSDN article , but I'm stuck
I was reading the following article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc817398.aspx Solving 11 Likely Problems In Your Multithreaded
MSDN displays the following for CreatePatternBrush: You can delete a pattern brush without affecting
the following code is from MSDN: Idisposable pattern protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing) {
I'm following this walkthrough: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/879kf95c(VS.80).aspx In a machine running vista ultimate, I have installed:
I am trying to understand the 'SocketAsyncEventArgs' class in C#. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.sockets.socketasynceventargs.aspx I am following
I got the following statement from an MSDN article . It says that the
Once I read an MSDN article that encouraged the following programming paradigm (its not

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.