Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 769123
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T18:17:12+00:00 2026-05-14T18:17:12+00:00

I am getting a segmentation fault with the following code after adding structs to

  • 0

I am getting a segmentation fault with the following code after adding structs to my queue.

The segmentation fault occurs when the MAX_QUEUE is set high but when I set it low (100 or 200), the error doesn’t occur. It has been a while since I last programmed in C, so any help is appreciated.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

#define MAX_QUEUE 1000

struct myInfo {
        char data[20];
};

struct myInfo* queue;
void push(struct myInfo);
int queue_head = 0;
int queue_size = 0;

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
        queue = (struct myInfo*) malloc(sizeof(struct myInfo) * MAX_QUEUE);

        struct myInfo info;
        char buf[10];
        strcpy(buf, "hello");

        while (1)
        {
                strcpy(info.data, buf);
                push(info);
        }
}

void push(struct myInfo info) {
        int next_index = sizeof(struct myInfo) * ((queue_size + queue_head) % MAX_QUEUE);
        printf("Pushing %s to %d\n", info.data, next_index);
        *(queue + (next_index)) = info;
        queue_size++;
}

Output:

Pushing hello to 0
Pushing hello to 20
...
Pushing hello to 7540
Pushing hello to 7560
Pushing hello to 7580
Segmentation fault
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T18:17:12+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:17 pm

    I think your problem lies here:

    int next_index = sizeof(struct myInfo) * ...
    *(queue + (next_index)) = info;
    

    You’re scaling next_index by the size of your structure but this is something done automatically by that second statement – *(queue + (next_index)) is equivalent to queue[next_index] and the latter is more readable to all but those of us who have been using C since K&R was first published 🙂

    In other words, next_index should be a value from 0 to MAX_QUEUE-1, so try changing the first statement to remove the multiplication by sizeof(struct myInfo):

    void push(struct myInfo info) {
        int next_index = (queue_size + queue_head) % MAX_QUEUE;
        printf("Pushing %s to %d\n", info.data, next_index);
        queue[next_index] = info;
        queue_size++;
    }
    

    And keep in mind that you’ll eventually overflow queue_size in that infinite loop of yours. You will presumably be checking to ensure that queue_size is not incremented beyond MAX_QUEUE in the final production-ready code, yes?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 382k
  • Answers 382k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Take a look at the Index Hint Syntax May 14, 2026 at 10:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you have code like this: char s[10]; gets( s… May 14, 2026 at 10:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Because of a trailing comma, right before the end of… May 14, 2026 at 10:29 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.