Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 894879
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T14:28:06+00:00 2026-05-15T14:28:06+00:00

I am getting following error: COM object that has been separated from its underlying

  • 0

I am getting following error:

"COM object that has been separated from its underlying RCW cannot be used."

I am sure the problem is because COM object is being called not on the thread it has been created – STA. I tried to implement IDisposable but it has not worked for me.

There is a couple of posts dealing with similar problem but which still do not solve my issue:

Is it safe to call an RCW from a finalizer?
Release Excel Object In My Destructor

Could anyone post an example/explain how COM object should be correctly accessed from another thread?

Here is minimal code which shows the problem:

using System;
using System.Threading;

namespace Test.ComInterop
{
    public class Program
    {
        MyCom _myCom;

        [STAThread]
        static void Main( string[] args )
        {
            new Program();
        }

        public Program()
        {
            _myCom = new MyCom();

            // this method call works
            string version = _myCom.ComMethod();

            StartThread();
        }

        private void StartThread()
        {
            Thread t = new Thread( UIRun );
            t.SetApartmentState( ApartmentState.STA );
            t.Start();
        }

        void UIRun()
        {
            TestUI window = new TestUI();
            window.Show();

            // this method call fails
            window.Title = _myCom.ComMethod();

            window.Closed += ( sender2, e2 ) 
                => window.Dispatcher.InvokeShutdown();

            System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.Run();
        }
    }

    class MyCom
    {
        private dynamic _com;
        public MyCom()
        {
            _com = Activator.CreateInstance(
                Type.GetTypeFromProgID( "Excel.Application" ) );
        }

        public string ComMethod()
        {
            return (string) _com.Version;
        }
    }    
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T14:28:07+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:28 pm

    The problem is your program’s startup thread. It creates the COM object, starts a thread, then exits. As part of the cleanup of that main thread, .NET calls CoUninitialize() and that’s the end of the COM object. Getting that error is the expected result.

    There’s just no point in letting your main startup thread exit like that. Let it do the work now done by your own thread, problem solved.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 446k
  • Answers 446k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In principle, the line Jabbaer.OnConnect += new jabber.connection.XmppStream.OnConnect(Some_event_function); is wrong… May 15, 2026 at 7:22 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Have a look at this article about communication in JSF,… May 15, 2026 at 7:21 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer i set the iPhone OS Deployment Target to iPhone 3.0… May 15, 2026 at 7:21 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.