Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8070599
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T13:26:10+00:00 2026-06-05T13:26:10+00:00

I am going through a c++ code base and in the header file (Executor.h)

  • 0

I am going through a c++ code base and in the header file (Executor.h) there is the public field definition

typedef std::pair<ExecutionState*,ExecutionState*> StatePair;

Inside the cpp file (Executor.cpp) there is a line

Executor::StatePair 
Executor::fork(ExecutionState &current, ref<Expr> condition, bool isInternal) { /* function definition */ }

in which this field is referenced right before one of the member function definitions

What is the purpose of stating the field name right before the definition ? Is it scoping issues ?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T13:26:13+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 1:26 pm

    The StatePair is a type. Its purpose in front of the function definition is to state the return type of the function

    Note the typedef in the definition of StatePair. It introduces a name alias for a type. In this case std::pair<ExecutionState*,ExecutionState*> will also be called StatePair, so you don’t have to write that long type name

    The return type of a function names the type that the value returned from the function must belong to. E.g. in the case of

    int f();
    

    the function f must return an integer (int), so we could write a definition like this:

    int f() {return 0;}
    

    there could be other statements in the function body, but the last one has to be a return with an integer value after it (in the bavode example the value is 0)

    As C++ does not care about new lines (treats them as regular white-space), the format

    int
    f() {...}
    

    is the same as for the above function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am going through my project code base, which consits of libraries and applications.
I was going through some VC++ code in a large code-base and came across
I'm going through my code base and refactoring some stuff. Occasionally, I run into
I am going through some code and at the beginning of the script we
i am going through the code for xml parser, and i found this code,
While I'm going through Python code and seeing functions called, I notice things like
I was going through some code that I downloaded off the internet ( Got
So I'm going through old code (2.0) and I came across this: object isReviewingValue
I was going through the source code of ArrayBlockingQueue and LinkedBlockingQueue. LinkedBlockingQueue has a
I'm going through the source code of the less unix tool by Mark Nudelman,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.