Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7164573
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T14:05:50+00:00 2026-05-28T14:05:50+00:00

I am happy with the operator =, which is synthesized by the compiler automatically.

  • 0

I am happy with the operator =, which is synthesized by the compiler automatically. But I want it to be private and do not want to bloat my code with page long definitions of the type

Foo& Foo::operator= (const Foo& foo)
{
    if (this == &foo)
        return *this;

    member1_    = foo.member1_;
    member2_    = foo.member2_;
    member3_    = foo.member2_;
    ...
    member1000_ = foo.member1000_;

    return *this;
} 

Please, is there a way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T14:05:51+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 2:05 pm

    In C++11 it is:

    class Foo
    {
        Foo& operator=(const Foo& source) = default;
    public:
        // ...
    };
    

    Unfortunately, most compilers haven’t implemented this part of the new standard yet.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am a happy BASH user. I do not want to switch to another
I'm not happy with the title but I think I overcomplicated my explanation and
I am quite happy to code out tables by hand when making a database
I'm not happy with the rendering of HTML by Swing's JEditorPane. In particular bullets
We're pretty happy with SVN right now, but Joel's tutorial intrigued me. So I
I was quite happy with my JSF app which read the contents of MQ
I was trying following code in which I defined copy c'tor explicitly to solve
From what I have read, I found that a built-in ternary operator does not
I was happy to cobble some code together that gives me a nice looking
I'm not really happy with my methods to build a tree structure in my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.