Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6058601
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T08:37:02+00:00 2026-05-23T08:37:02+00:00

I am having problem understanding the complete step and incomplete step in greedy scheduling

  • 0

I am having problem understanding the complete step and incomplete step in greedy scheduling in Multi-threaded programing in cilk.

Here is the power-point presentation for reference.

Cilk ++ Multi-threaded Programming

The problem I have understanding is in from slide # 32 – 37.

Can someone please explain especially the how is

Complete step>=P threads ready to run
incomplete steps < p threads ready

Thanks for your time and help

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T08:37:02+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 8:37 am

    First, note that “threads” mentioned in the slides are not like OS threads as one may think. Their definition of a thread is given at slide 10: "a maximal sequence of instructions not containing parallel control (spawn, sync, return)". To avoid further confusion, let me call it a task instead.

    On slides 32-35, a circle represents a task (“thread”), and edges represent dependencies between tasks. And the sentences you ask about are in fact definitions: when P or more tasks are ready to run (and so all P processors can be busy doing some work) the situation is called a complete step, while if less than P tasks are ready, the situation is called an incomplete step. To simplify the analysis, it is (implicitly) assumed that all tasks contain equal work (of size 1).

    Then the theorem on the slide 35 provides an upper bound of time required for a greedy scheduler to run a program. Since all the execution is a sequence of complete and incomplete steps, the execution time is the sum of all steps. Since each complete step performs exactly P work, the number of complete steps cannot be bigger than T1 (total work) divided by P. Then, each incomplete step must execute a task belonging to the critical path (because at every step at least one critical path task must be ready, and incomplete steps execute all ready tasks); so the overall number of incomplete steps does not exceed the span T_inf (critical path length). Thus the sum of T1/P and T_inf gives an upper bound on execution time.

    The rest of slides in the “Scheduling Theory” section are rather straightforward.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm having a little bit of trouble understanding what the problem is here. I
I'm having a problem understanding what I'm doing wrong here. I have the code
I'm having a problem understanding the shift/reduce confict for a grammar that I know
I'm new to Ruby, so I'm having some trouble understanding this weird exception problem
I'm quite new to OpenId and I'm having a bit of a problem understanding
Having problem understanding Delegate error. Error says expression expected, How do I fix? Thanks
I am having a problem understanding how polymorphism works when using generics. As an
I am having problem understanding the differences between 'master' 'origin master' 'origin/master', 'remotes/origin/master'!! Is
I am half way reading the OWL2 primer and is having problem understanding the
I'm having a problem understanding how to do something in LINQ. I have a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.