Home/ Questions/Q 9189065
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-17T20:09:41+00:00

I am having second thoughts about something I’ve been taking for granted. Namely, in

  • 0

I am having second thoughts about something I’ve been taking for granted. Namely, in an EAR with the following structure:

EAR
 \-- boo-ejb.jar
 \-- foo-web.war
 |    \--WEB-INF
 |          \--lib
 \--lib

.. I think I understand correctly that the WEB-INF/lib is for jars needed only by the web application and the EAR-level lib for jars needed by the ejb.jar as well. The rationale being to somehow make the dependencies clearer. However, why not just dump everything in the EAR-level lib folder ? Surely if there is a conflict of some sort we would like to know and investigate in depth. Wouldn’t that be a cleaner solution and less prone to covering up a potential compatibility / dependency mismatch problem?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    You’re absolutely right – it would be much clearer and less error prone to dependency mismatch.

    But…

    What in cases where you don’t distribute your web applications within an EAR? Where would you place the libs? How would you go about distributing your webapps throughout different EARs so you would compose enterprise applications based upon a set of webapps?

    WEB-INF/lib is also for jars that can contain resources only (with no classes within). Would you then put the web-oriented resources jars in EAR-level lib? I don’t think so.

    There are perhaps more reasons to use WEB-INF/lib over an EAR’s lib, but the above two/three cases should be enough to at least convince you to re-think the strategy to manage libraries.

    • 0