Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8051523
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T07:19:17+00:00 2026-06-05T07:19:17+00:00

I am having trouble figuring out the proper way to define the [ ,

  • 0

I am having trouble figuring out the proper way to define the [, $, and [[ subset operators for an S4 class.

Can anyone provide me with a basic example of defining these three for an S4 class?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T07:19:18+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 7:19 am

    Discover the generic so that we know what we are aiming for

    > getGeneric("[")
    standardGeneric for "[" defined from package "base"
    
    function (x, i, j, ..., drop = TRUE) 
    standardGeneric("[", .Primitive("["))
    <bytecode: 0x32e25c8>
    <environment: 0x32d7a50>
    Methods may be defined for arguments: x, i, j, drop
    Use  showMethods("[")  for currently available ones.
    

    Define a simple class

    setClass("A", representation=representation(slt="numeric"))
    

    and implement a method

    setMethod("[", c("A", "integer", "missing", "ANY"),
        ## we won't support subsetting on j; dispatching on 'drop' doesn't
        ## make sense (to me), so in rebellion we'll quietly ignore it.
        function(x, i, j, ..., drop=TRUE)
    {
        ## less clever: update slot, return instance
        ## x@slt = x@slt[i]
        ## x
        ## clever: by default initialize is a copy constructor, too
        initialize(x, slt=x@slt[i])
    })
    

    In action:

    > a = new("A", slt=1:5)
    > a[3:1]
    An object of class "A"
    Slot "slt":
    [1] 3 2 1
    

    There are different strategies for supporting the (implicitly) many signatures, for instance you’d likely also want to support logical and character index values, possibly for both i and j. The most straight-forward is a “facade” pattern where each method does some preliminary coercion to a common type of subset index, e.g., integer to allow for re-ordering and repetition of index entries, and then uses callGeneric to invoke a single method that does the work of subsetting the class.

    There are no conceptual differences for [[, other than wanting to respect the semantics of returning the content rather than another instance of the object as implied by [. For $ we have

    > getGeneric("$")
    standardGeneric for "$" defined from package "base"
    
    function (x, name) 
    standardGeneric("$", .Primitive("$"))
    <bytecode: 0x31fce40>
    <environment: 0x31f12b8>
    Methods may be defined for arguments: x
    Use  showMethods("$")  for currently available ones.
    

    and

    setMethod("$", "A",
        function(x, name)
    {
        ## 'name' is a character(1)
        slot(x, name)
    })
    

    with

    > a$slt
    [1] 1 2 3 4 5
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm having trouble figuring out what's the proper way to setup a SSL virtual
I'm having some trouble figuring out the proper way to walk a Python traceback
I'm having trouble figuring out the proper way to update nested data using Google
I'm having trouble figuring out the proper way of using pythons unittest framework I
I am having trouble figuring out the most elegant and flexible way to switch
I'm having trouble figuring out a way to conditionally cancel an asp:TextBox's OnTextChanged AutoPostBack
Perhaps I'm just having trouble figuring out the callbackyness, but I can't figure out
I'm having trouble figuring out if/how I can an internal webserver setup for testing
I'm having some trouble figuring out why I can only get the children of
I am having trouble figuring out the best way to set up animation with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.