Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3458530
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:59:38+00:00 2026-05-18T09:59:38+00:00

I am implementing a thread pool. The work required by each thread is 1-10

  • 0

I am implementing a thread pool. The work required by each thread is 1-10 seconds of CPU, so I’m happy to have a traditional thread pool with workers, or I’m happy to spawn a new thread for each unit of work. It doesn’t matter.

I would like to have some way for the master control thread to know when one of the N worker threads finishes its work and is ready for more (or its time to start another). I’ve looked at pthread_join and pthread_cond_wait. There doesn’t seem to be a way to wait for one of N. So I thought about having the master thread have a variable that it uses to go to sleep and having the workers wake it up. This seems to work if the workers don’t die. However, if they die, there’s a window between the time that the worker wakes up the controller and the time it dies which I don’t want to deal with.

I’ve looked at Intel’s TBB but it looks much more complicated than I need.

Is there a simple equivalent in PTHREADS to WaitForMultipleObjects in Microsoft Windows?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:59:39+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:59 am

    This is a reasonably simple use case for condition variables.

    Have an integer count of the number of active work items, mutex protected. In addition, have two condition variables, one for signalling the worker threads that work is available on a queue, the other to signal the main thread that a thread has finished. Something like:

    main:
        set freethreads to numthreads
        init mutex M, condvars TOMAIN and TOWORKER
        start N worker threads
        while true:
            wait for work item
            claim M
            while freethreads == 0:
                cond-wait TOMAIN, M
            put work item in queue
            decrement freethreads
            cond-signal TOWORKER
            release M
    
    worker:
        init
        while true:
            claim M
            while no work in queue:
                cond-wait TOWORKER, M
            get work to local storage
            release M
            do work
            claim M
            increment freethreads
            cond-signal TOMAIN
            release M
    

    Note that the loops run forever. In reality, there would be signals which made them exit and run termination/cleanup code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When implementing Quicksort, one of the things you have to do is to choose
I am implementing exception handling for our BizTalk services, and have run into a
I'm having trouble adding a copy constructor to this class: http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk/threading/implementing-a-thread-safe-queue-using-condition-variables.html I need to
I am implementing this class as a singleton. I am not good at thread
Implementing Equals() for reference types is harder than it seems. My current canonical implementation
Implementing a 'sandbox' environment in Python used to be done with the rexec module
When implementing a needle search of a haystack in an object-oriented way, you essentially
I implementing a EventQueue and get notified when AWTEvents are send. I wait till
When implementing a singleton in C++, is it better for GetInstance() to return a
I'm implementing a tagging system for a website. There are multiple tags per object

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.