Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8988345
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T21:59:51+00:00 2026-06-15T21:59:51+00:00

I am implementing an union-find data structure in Haskell. I wanted to use parametrized

  • 0

I am implementing an union-find data structure in Haskell.

I wanted to use parametrized types but I am facing a little issue when I try to compare the objects I use as parameters.

data UnionFindElement valueType =
    RootElement valueType |
    ElementWithParent valueType (UnionFindElement valueType)

holds :: UnionFindElement valueType -> valueType -> Bool
holds (RootElement v) value = v == value

It seems that equality is not defined.

No instance for (Eq valueType)
  arising from a use of `=='
In the expression: v == value

How can I restrict valueType to consider only types with a defined equality relationship?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T21:59:52+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 9:59 pm

    holds :: (Eq valueType) => UnionFindElement valueType -> valueType -> Bool

    (Eq valueType) => means valueType is from class Eq (equatable values), and the construct exists exactly to be able to restrict types of generic parameters.

    Please note this also works on data declarations and several other places. You can learn more on http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Classes_and_types#Type_constraints

    For a more general overview, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_class and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad-hoc_polymorphism

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm implementing a union-find data structure in C#. The elements must extend the Element
I am experimenting with implementing boost::optional like data structure using c++11 features. Here is
After implementing the data structure suggested in this thread , I decided to fill
when implementing a recursive function during development, i will use a counter and exit
Implementing a custom VM and I've come to use registers (these will store pointers
Implementing a low pass FIR filter, when should one use FFT and IFFT instead
Implementing a GIT repository for a project we are including the DB structure by
I am hitting this error when implementing core data. I have created a entity
I`m implementing a custom filesystem on Ubuntu using Fuse, but I need to trap
Implementing Equals() for reference types is harder than it seems. My current canonical implementation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.