Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 540927
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:17:26+00:00 2026-05-13T10:17:26+00:00

I am iterating over an array in MooTools but seeing additional items when iterating

  • 0

I am iterating over an array in MooTools but seeing additional items when iterating through the array using the shorthand for..in loop. It works fine when I use the regular for loop. Is this a problem with MooTools polluting the global namespace or am I doing something wrong here?

There is a createTabs() function that iterates over an array and creates a tab for each value in the array:

function createTabs() {
    var myTabs = [["First", "a.png"], ["Second", "b.png"]];
    for(var i in myTabs) {
        var tab = new Tab(myTabs[i][0], myTabs[i][1]);
        console.log(i);
    }
}

This is the output of console.log(i):

0
1
$family
each
clean
associate
link
contains
extend
getLast
getRandom
include
combine
erase
empty
flatten
hexToRgb
rgbToHex
toJSON

I understand the first 2 indexes, but where is the rest coming from?

Edit: Thanks for the quick answers Chetan and k Prime. That makes sense, and the Array.each addition by MooTools is much cleaner way to iterate!

Looks a lot better now:

myTabs.each(function(item) {
    var tab = new Tab(item[0], item[1]);
    console.log(item);
});
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:17:27+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:17 am

    for..in is not meant for array iteration. It iterates over all the properties of an object that are not built-in. Since MooTools has added more functions to Array prototype, they are now array properties as well. See this https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference/Statements/For…in

    Just use a basic for loop for array iteration.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 351k
  • Answers 351k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The "trick" here is that you want to have MEF… May 14, 2026 at 7:14 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Build on things that work May 14, 2026 at 7:14 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Something like this: $items_pool = array(...); $result = false; foreach… May 14, 2026 at 7:14 am

Related Questions

Hey I have an array of hexadecimal colors and for each color in the
In C#/VB.NET/.NET, which loop runs faster, for or foreach ? Ever since I read
I have a YAML document like this: --- version: 1 rootdirectory: - subdirectory: -
I am currently building a method that takes an object that is of type
Coming from OO (C#, Java, Scala) I value very highly the principles of both

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.