Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1001397
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:39:56+00:00 2026-05-16T07:39:56+00:00

I am leaning towards using std::tr1::shared_ptr to automatically manage a pointer to a utility

  • 0

I am leaning towards using std::tr1::shared_ptr to automatically manage a pointer to a utility class in my GUI program.

Basically here’s a skeleton of the program:

int main () {
    Allocate dynamic memory for utility class

    GUI code.. GUI code... GUI Code..
    GUI Main Loop
}

The program finishes when the user calls a quit_cb or if SIGINT (CTRL+C) is called. In my situation, I need to be able to call delete in either case. I can call delete in quit_cb but if SIGINT is called … then delete is never called! Is it appropriate to use a smart pointer in this case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:39:57+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:39 am

    You can catch the Ctrl-C as well and call quit_cb/delete even in that case.

    How can I catch a ctrl-c event? (C++)

    So no matter the exit case you are always covered. No need for an auto-pointer or anything “smart”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 529k
  • Answers 529k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer QHttp will send a set of signals to notify the… May 16, 2026 at 11:18 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can draw an image with UIImage *myImage = [UIImage… May 16, 2026 at 11:18 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use the pattern below with IsNull() or Coalesce() function Where… May 16, 2026 at 11:18 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I'm trying to model a specialization/generalization, leaning towards using class table inheritance (see this
Obviously the point of using named constants over magic numbers is for code clarity
We're setting up a reporting service for a website, and right now I'm leaning
I am developing an application in Rails 3 using a nosql database. I am
I'm using Catalyst for my Perl web app. What is the accepted way of
I have worked on two projects using Ajax and Ruby. In one project, I
This is a follow-up to my question from yesterday . I have Scott Meyers'
We are trying to decide how to handle object persistence accross postbacks, to avoid
I am curious if anyone has done a comparison between the different options out
I'm working on a DSL that should support a time literal and am interested

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.