Question

I am learning Objective C and noticed this funky quirk while reading up on methods.

Like Java and C++, Obj.C can take in multiple parameters, which is fine, however it states that objective C methods can have multiple names which does not seem to register to well with me.

For instance:

-(NSArray *)shipsAtPoint:(CGPoint)bombLocation withDamage:(BOOL)damaged;

In the above example, there are two parameters, bombLocation (return type CGPoint) and damaged (return type BOOL) and alongside the method name seems to be split as shipsatpoint:withDamage

I don’t understand what’s up with this…
What does it signify when it states that a method can have multiple names?
Is this applicable only for methods that require multiple parameters? Alternately, say I want to name my method with a single name but provide it with multiple parameters, is that possible or I must provide it with multiple names each of which correspond to a parameter? If yes, then why?

Thanks for jumping in with my confusion!!! 🙂

Answer 1

The reason is to make it easier to understand.

With your example, the method would be something like this in C++:

 int shipsAtPointWithDamage (CGPoint bomb, BOOL damage)  //I don't really know C++ 

OK, so the first parameter is the ship’s point, and the damage is the second. It’s easy enough to figure out, but that’s the thing, you have to FIGURE it out, you have to look at the method to try and figure out what each thing is.

In Objective-C you have

-(NSArray *)shipsAtPoint:(CGPoint)bombLocation withDamage:(BOOL)damaged;

Each parameter is clearly defined, the first is the ship’s point, the second is damage. It reads like a sentence, whereas with C++ (and almost every other language) it doesn’t.

If you want a method to have multiple parameters in Obj-C you have to write it this way:

-(returnType)paraOne:(type*)name paraTwo:(type*)name

It’s something that just takes getting used to, every language is different. Once you get used to the way Objective-C does things, you’ll think it’s absolutely fantastic.

EDIT: and as filipe pointed out, because the method as multiple parameters it doesn’t mean it has multiple names, in the example I gave above, the method name would be paraOne:paraTwo, NOT paraOne: