Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8609233
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T03:50:03+00:00 2026-06-12T03:50:03+00:00

I am looking at some assembly that was generated by disassembling some C programs

  • 0

I am looking at some assembly that was generated by disassembling some C programs and I am confused by a single optimization that I see repeated frequently.

When I have no optimizations on the GCC compiler uses the subl instruction for subtraction, but when I do have optimizations turned on (-O3 to be precise) the compiler uses a leal instruction instead of subtraction, example below:

without optimizations:

83 e8 01     subl $0x1, %eax 

with optimizations

8d 6f ff     leal -0x1(%edi), %ebp 

Both of these instructions are 3 bytes long, so I am not seeing an optimization here. Could someone help me out and try to explain the compiler’s choice ?

Any help would be appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T03:50:05+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 3:50 am

    It’s hard to tell without seeing the original C code that produces this.

    But if I had to guess, it’s because the leal allows the subtraction to be done out-of-place without destroying the source register.

    This can save an extra register move.


    The first example:

    83 e8 01     subl $0x1, %eax 
    

    overwrites %eax thereby destroying the original value.

    The second example :

    8d 6f ff     leal -0x1(%edi), %ebp 
    

    stores %edi - 1 into %ebp. %edi is preserved for future use.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been looking at some assembly code and have found that this comes
Looking at some assembly code for x86_64 on my Mac, I see the following
I'm looking at some assembly for the start up of some firmware that runs
I have an assembly that provides an API and is used by some other
I am looking for some framework that allows decompiling a .NET assembly to get
I have a windows application that uses an assembly that stores some configuration settings
Looking for some guidance on a WCF service I’m prototyping. I have a WCF
looking for some help with images referenced within the stylesheet. I have no problems
I am looking at some existing real-mode code that uses the in and out
I have some C# code which is using CSharpCodeProvider.CompileAssemblyFromSource to create an assembly in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.