Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1069713
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T20:27:34+00:00 2026-05-16T20:27:34+00:00

I am looking for a thread-safe collection of to store ThreadIDs (long) in Java.

  • 0

I am looking for a thread-safe collection of to store ThreadIDs (long) in Java. What is the best option? I need to preserve the order of addition.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T20:27:36+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 8:27 pm

    You can use any list and wrap it with a Synchronized Implementation.

    Example:

    List<Type> list =
        Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<Type>());
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 541k
  • Answers 541k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Instead of adding columns to Quartz tables, take a look… May 17, 2026 at 3:03 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try this: Select round((cast(133 as numeric(20,8))/ cast(150 as numeric(20,8))) *… May 17, 2026 at 3:03 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The concept is called mail merge. You will have to… May 17, 2026 at 3:03 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Related: Does java have a "LinkedConcurrentHashMap" data structure? I am looking for a collection
How do I make code like this thread safe? public static class Converter {
the lazy thread-safe singleton instantion is kinda not easy to understand to every coder,
What's the simplest way to preserve a NHibernate ISessionFactory for web pages and web
I am looking at this piece of code. This constructor delegates to the native
To recap for those .NET gurus who might not know the Java API: ConcurrentHashMap
I need to implement a MultiKeyMap, where I can have 2 keys and a
When designing a collection class, is there any reason not to implement locking privately
I have been looking for a solution to this problem for ages. I have
in trying to improve my understanding on concurrency issues, I am looking at the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.