Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7829017
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T10:35:04+00:00 2026-06-02T10:35:04+00:00

I am looking over some code to review and have come across a busy

  • 0

I am looking over some code to review and have come across a busy wait as such:

int loop = us*32;
int x;
for(x = 0;x<loop;x++)
{
    /*do nothing*/      
}

I seem to recall reading that these empty loops can be optimized away. Is this what would happen here or can this work?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T10:35:05+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 10:35 am

    You’re at the mercy of the compiler. Indeed if it’s smart it will detect it’s a noop. Incidentally, Neil Butterworth has a nice post where he also touches on this subject.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Am looking over some snippets of code and have come across a return statement
I'm looking over some previous developers code and I come across this line: location.href
I was looking over some code the other day and I came across: static
I'm looking over some code and I came across some syntax that I don't
When looking through some code I took over, I came across this line: my
I have been looking over this code for the past hour, I cant see
Looking over some older code, I've run into a strange namespace error. Let's say
I am looking over some code that has heavy use of Java's instanceof operator.
While looking over some Ruby code I noticed methods declared with self. prepended to
I was looking over some C++ code and I ran into this memcpy function.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.