Home/ Questions/Q 55323
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-10T17:21:34+00:00

I am looking to store 2D arrays of 900×100 elements in a database. Efficient

  • 0

I am looking to store 2D arrays of 900×100 elements in a database. Efficient recall and comparison of the arrays is important. I could use a table with a schema like [A, x, y, A(x,y)] such that a single array would compromise 90,000 records. This seems like an ~ok~ table design to store the array, and would provide for efficient recall of single elements, but inefficient recall of a whole array and would make for very inefficient array comparisons.

Should I leave the table design this way and build and compare my arrays in code? Or is there a better way to structure the table such that I can get efficient array comparisons using database only operations?

thanks

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. If the type of data allows, store it in a concatenated format and compare in memory after it has been de-concatenated. The database operation will be much faster and the in-memory operations will be faster than database retrievals as well.

    Who knows, you may even be able to compare it without de-concatenating.

    • 0