Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I am new to cherrypy, and am moving code from pylons to cherrypy … I have a WSGIGateway object that i graft onto my cherrypy tree.
cherrypy.tree.graft(mygatewayobj, '/foo/')
I also have a routes dispatcher
dispatcher.connect(route = '/foo', name ='foocontroller', controller = mygatewayobj)
Should I have both connections for the gateway, or is this redundancy a possible reason for my unexpected, error-message-less crashes? Also, if I do need to graft, should it be
/foo/ or /foo?
The performance of
routesDispatcher.connect()is very poor compared tocherrypy.graft.tree().I did some benchmark test for cherrypy and the results I got was completely unexpected.
The RPS drops down to nearly half when you try to use cherrypy’s
RouteDispatchermechanism to route the URL. I was able to get around 2500 RPS when usingcherrypy.graft.tree()and the RPS drops to around 1100 when using the routes dispatcher.My suggestion will be to go with
cherrypy.graft.tree()as it allows you to add URL on the fly without doing a config update and is also much faster.