Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3675362
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T02:58:01+00:00 2026-05-19T02:58:01+00:00

I am new to shared pointers and was wondering how to initalize a shared

  • 0

I am new to shared pointers and was wondering how to initalize a shared pointer if it is also a member variable?

Currently my code looks something like this:
In the header file, I have:

class Parser {
   public:
      Parser();
      ~Parser();

      boost::shared_ptr<XercesDOMParser> parser;
{

In the constructor, I have something like this:

Parser::Parser() 
{
   try {
      XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize(); 
   } catch (...) {}

   parser = shared_ptr<XercesDOMParser> (new XercesDomParser()); 
}

In the destructor I have:

Parser::~Parser() {
   try {
      XMLPlatformUtils::Terminate();
   }catch(...) {}
}

However compiling the program with Valgrind, I would receive the following error:
Pure virtual method called.
Terminated without an active exception.
Invalid read of size 8.

Any insights into what I may be doing incorrectly with the initialization?

My suspicion is I am reading from unallocated memory.

EDIT:

So in the destructor, I added the following lines of code before the terminate command and the memory leaks and errors all disappeared!

if (parser)
parser.reset();

Why does all reference to the parser have to be gone before it can be deallocated?

Much appreciated, thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T02:58:01+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 2:58 am

    You are calling XMLPlatformUtils::Terminate() before calling the destructor for XercesDomParser. Destructors for member variables are called after the destructor body runs. Member variables are constructed in order of declaration, and destroyed in reverse.

    You could do something like this:

    class Parser : boost::noncopyable {
        struct XmlHandle {
            XmlHandle() { XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize(); }
            ~XmlHandle() { XMLPlatformUtils::Terminate(); }
        };
    
        XmlHandle m_handle;
        boost::shared_ptr<XercesDOMParser> m_parser;
    
    public:
        Parser() : m_parser(new XercesDomParser) { }
    };
    

    And just use the default destructor. If you want copy constructors and assignment operators you’ll need to deal with that.

    Oh, and catching and throwing away exceptions is probably a bad idea …

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

OK, I started using shared-pointers and pass shared-pointers as much as possible. No conversion
I am busy designing a new C++ application. In this application I want to
In a new piece of code I have several different classes that refer to
I'm pretty new to the world of pointers and have run into a problem
I'm just toying around with the smart pointers in the upcoming new c++ standard.
I am using boost shared_ptr with my own memory manager like this (stripped down
This might be a doozy for some. I'm not sure if it's even 100%
I have a project and I want make smart pointers usage better. The main
I am using C++. C++0x using Visual Studio 2010 to be correct. Suppose I
Take the following example: class BookManager { ... }; class Book { public: void

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.