Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 709681
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T04:31:49+00:00 2026-05-14T04:31:49+00:00

I am no newb on OO programming, but I am faced with a puzzling

  • 0

I am no newb on OO programming, but I am faced with a puzzling situation. I have been given a program to work on and extend, but the previous developers didn’t seem that comfortable with OO, it seems they either had a C background or an unclear understanding of OO. Now, I don’t suggest I am a better developer, I just think that I can spot some common OO errors. The difficult task is how to amend them.

In my case, I see a lot of this:

        if (ret == 1) {
            out.print("yadda yadda");
        } else if (ret == 2) {
            out.print("yadda yadda");
        } else if (ret == 3) {
            out.print("yadda yadda");
        } else if (ret == 0) {
            out.print("yadda yadda");
        } else if (ret == 5) {
            out.print("yadda yadda");
        } else if (ret == 6) {
            out.print("yadda yadda");
        } else if (ret == 7) {
            out.print("yadda yadda");
        }

ret is a value returned by a function, in which all Exceptions are swallowed, and in the catch blocks, the above values are returned explicitly. Oftentimes, the Exceptions are simply swallowed, with empty catch blocks.

It’s obvious that swalllowing exceptions is wrong OO design. My question concerns the use of return values. I believe that too is wrong, however I think that using Exceptions for control flow is equally wrong, and I can’t think of anything to replace the above in a correct, OO manner.

Your input, please?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T04:31:49+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:31 am

    But this is Java (not C++). So if you work with `codes’ like that you ought to work with Enums. And using Enums (or integers, incidentally) you can use the switch() statement to improve code like that a lot.

    public abstract class Example {
    
        protected abstract ErrorCode test();
    
        public void run() {
           ErrorCode code=test();
           switch(code) {
               case OK: 
                   System.out.println("All ok"); 
               break;
               case OOPS: 
                   System.out.println("Oops, an error occurred.");
               break;
               case OTHER_ERROR: 
                   System.out.println("A different error occurred");
               break;
               case UNKNOWN_ERROR: 
                   System.out.println("Yet another, unknown error occurred.");
               break;
           }
        }
    
        public static enum ErrorCode {
            OK, OOPS, OTHER_ERROR, UNKNOWN_ERROR;
        }
    }
    

    This can be extended to give it some more Continuation Passing Style flavour; by defining a callback method for ErrorCode and calling that method instead of doing the switch() statement.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am a ruby newb and am having a problem with procs created inside
Basically what the title says. (Forgive me because I am a .NET newb) In
Alright, I'll preface this with the fact that I'm a GTK and Python newb,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.