Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8687393
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T23:06:18+00:00 2026-06-12T23:06:18+00:00

I am not sure to that. Can I write a large memset (for example

  • 0

I am not sure to that. Can I write a large memset (for example 10 MB), on four cores to gain speedup with this?

Is such ram-chip parallelization possible at all, and also how big are time costs of firing other threads – is it more than a millisecond or less?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T23:06:19+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 11:06 pm

    You are pointing out a right question, at the same time it is difficult to give a simple answer to it. There are several aspects involved.

    1. Overhead of starting new threads (or picking them from some cache);
    2. Contension on the memory bus.
    3. The aspects above differ and have very different cost for different platforms.

    Bigger PCs have several memory buses. Smaller ones have only one. On a one memory bus system this does not make any sense. If your system has several memory buses (channels) your array of data may have arbitrary split between memory banks. If it will happen that the whole array sits in the same memory bank, the parralelisation will be useless. Figuring out the layout of your array is an overhead again. In other words before splitting the operation between cores it is necessary to figure out if this is worth doing or not.

    Simple answer is that these difficult to predict overheads will most likely will consume the benefit and make the overall result worse.

    At the same time for a really huge memory area on some architectures it makes sense.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm not sure that title conveys my meaning, please change it if you can
I'm not even sure that Postgres' HStore data type can contain nested hashes, and
I am not sure where i've seen this before, but im sure that there
I see this question here on SO but I am not sure that answers
After reading this article on thedailywtf.com, I'm not sure that I really got the
Well, not sure I am going to be able to write this out to
Im not sure that its possible to do what I want to accomplish. I
I'm not sure that title is worded very well, but not sure how else
I am not sure that I understand Isolated storage. I read the article http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3ak841sy%28VS.80%29.aspx
Specifically in JAX-RS (I'm not sure that is relevant) there are methods that allow

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.