Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 742111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T08:42:37+00:00 2026-05-14T08:42:37+00:00

I am putting together an internal every developer should know wiki page. I saw

  • 0

I am putting together an internal “every developer should know” wiki page.

I saw many discussions regarding rand() % N, but not a single web page that explains it all.

For instance, I am curious if this problem is only C- and Linux-specific, or if it also applies to Windows, C++,. Java, .Net, Python, Perl.

Please help me get to the bottom of this. Also, just how non-random do the numbers get? Thank you!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T08:42:38+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 8:42 am

    I don’t have a web page to refer you to but I might have a “back of the envelope” explanation that would help. The way simple random number generators work is by following the steps

    1. Use the last number generated n or a seed number.
    2. Multiply that number by a special large number
    3. Add another special large number
    4. Divide that by a third special large number and throw away the remainder
    5. Return the result

    Now if you think about what happens in all but step 4 you are doing operations where only the lower bits can alter the lower bits of the result. Adding 1001 and 100…00001 will end in …02 (Ha you though I was talking base 2, really these number are base 12 for giggles.) regardless of what is on the high end of the calculation. Similarly, when you multiply it will end in a 1, no matter what.

    There is a similar problem at the top end as well, a billion times a billion will invariably dominate the contribution of the hundreds places of wither number. This points to the fact that the middle is where the good stuff happens. Lots of bits interact here–high, middle, and low.

    That is the purpose of the division step, it cuts off the bottom chunk of the result where there was not as much interaction. The top chunk is not usually chopped off because the computer drops the upper bits when the multiplications do not fit into a machine word any more.

    In the end though the cut off points are somewhat arbitrary and you can be more picky than the people who designed the algorithm and still chop off a few more bits.

    For you question of how bad they can be, they can be really bad. The easiest way to see this is to group individual numbers into tuples and graph them. So if you had random numbers a, b, c, d, ... graph (a,b), (c,d), ... and look at the results. This is called a Spectral Test and Rand fails it beautifully. This one I have a link for try http://random.mat.sbg.ac.at/results/karl/spectraltest/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am putting together a build system and wanted to know if there is
I am putting together a proposal for a large multinational company for our licenced
I'm putting together a script to find remove duplicates in a large library of
I am putting together some ideas for our automated testing platform and have been
I'm interested in putting together my first online game using Flash as the client
I'm putting together a small web app that writes to a database (Perl CGI
I am putting together an Java application that needs to display some basic lab
I am currently putting together a rails-based web application which will only serve and
I am putting together a Samba-based server as a Primary Domain Controller, and ran
As part of a larger web-app (using CakePHP), I'm putting together a simple blog

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.