Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7398177
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T03:50:20+00:00 2026-05-29T03:50:20+00:00

I am quite new in Ruby so would like to know and learn how

  • 0

I am quite new in Ruby so would like to know and learn how to DRY. I have 2 if statement that’s very similar, is there anyway to refactor it?

msg1,msg2 = msg.split('.')

if !msg1.nil?
   items = msg1.split(',')
   items.each do |item|
     item.strip!
   end
   somefunction(items)
end

if !msg2.nil?
   items = msg2.split(',')
   items.each do |item|
     item.strip!
   end
   somefunction(items)
end 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T03:50:20+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 3:50 am

    Looks like you can do away with the two variables:

    msg.split('.').each do |msg|
     items = msg.split(',').map(&:strip)
     somefunction(items)
    end 
    

    Edit: I removed the unless since the array created by split will not contain any. In your original code it made sense in case the array had 0 or 1 element, but by using each this becomes unnecessary.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I do not have problem as such but I am quite new to Ruby.
Iam quite new to functions in SQL and I would like to create a
This is probably very simple, but I'm quite new to ruby and active record.
I'm quite new to that functional programming paradigm, but so far I like it.
I'm very new to Ruby on Rails, and have been getting the following error
first of all, i am quite new to Ruby, although i have a strong
I'm quite new to ruby and I'm blocking on this simple issue: I have
I'm quite new to programming, and I was wondering if there is a good
Hi I am quite new to php but i have been following some tutorials
I'm quite new to php and have been reading Larry Ullman book to develop

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.