Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6070249
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:54:43+00:00 2026-05-23T09:54:43+00:00

I am reading Damian Conway’s Perl Best Practices and found the following code snipet:

  • 0

I am reading Damian Conway’s “Perl Best Practices” and found the following code snipet:

$have_reconsidered{lc($name)}++;

I am trying to figure out what is going on here with the hash. I know ++ increments by one in a numeric context, but what does it do to a hash?

From perlop documentation:

undef is always treated as numeric,
and in particular is changed to 0
before incrementing (so that a
post-increment of an undef value will
return 0 rather than undef). The
auto-decrement operator is not
magical.

So in the example above, is the value for the key lc($name) being initialized to 0 and then incremented to 1 by ++?

In general, where could I find out more about the behaviors of ++, +=, etc…?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:54:43+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:54 am

    %have_reconsidered is your hash. $name is a string. lc($name) returns the lowercased string. $hash{$key} will return the scalar value from hash %hash stored with key $key. so:

    // get scalar value from hash at key lc($name) and post-increment it
    $have_reconsidered(lc($name)}++;
    

    so, all you do is increment the value in a hash at a given index (namely lc($name))

    test case:

    #!/bin/env perl
    my %hash = ( 'a' => '2' );
    my $name = 'A';
    print $hash{lc($name)}++; // prints 2 (incremented after statement)
    print $hash{lc($name)};   // prints 3
    print ++$hash{lc($name)}; // prints 4 (incremented before statement)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Reading this question I found this as (note the quotation marks) code to solve
Reading source code of sample projects, such as Beast and Bort, are recommended as
Reading the answers to previous questions regarding SharePoint alerts, I have found many interesting
Reading the data the following way data<-read.csv(userStats.csv, sep=,, header=F) I tried to select an
Reading this Perl: extract rows from 1 to n (Windows) I didn't understand the
Reading Real world Haskell i found some intresting question about data types: This pattern
Reading through a paper for the ARM Cortex-M3 CPU I found this line confusing:
reading the SCJP book, I've found something like this in the chapter 1 self-test
Reading some articles, it is best to have POJO object to do JSON or
Reading an article called Increase LINQ Query Performance in July's MSDN magazine, the author

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.