Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7052521
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T03:23:37+00:00 2026-05-28T03:23:37+00:00

I am reading Efficient c++ (older version) and have some doubts. Here, for example,

  • 0

I am reading Efficient c++ (older version) and have some doubts.
Here, for example, it says:

When you do something like this

#define ASPECT_RATIO 1.653

the symbolic name ASPECT_RATIO may never be seen by the compilers; it may be removed by the preprocessors before the source code ever gets compiled. As a results the ASPECT_RATIO may never get entered to SYMBOLIC_TABLE. It an be confusing if you get an error during compilation involving the constant, because the error message may refer to 1.653 and not ASPECT_RATIO

I don’t understand this paragraph.How can anything be removed the preprocessor, just like that. what could be the reasons and how feasible are they in real world.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T03:23:38+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 3:23 am

    I don’t understand this paragraph under inverted quotes.How can
    anything be removed the preprocessor, just like that. what could be
    the reasons and how feasible are they in real world.

    Basically what it describes is exactly how C and C++ pre-processor works. The reason is to replace macros/constants (that are made using the #define directive) with their actual values, instead of repeating the same values over and over again. In C++ it is considered a bad style using C-style macros, but they’re supported for C compatibility.

    The preprocessor, as the name suggests, runs prior to the actual compilation, and is basically changing the source code as directed through the pre-processor directives (those starting with #). This also includes replacement of the macros with their values, the inclusion of the header files as directed by the #include directive, etc etc.

    This is used in order to avoid code repetitions, magic numbers, to share interfaces (header files) and many other useful things.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Reading this question , I've decided I need to use something like this: list<vector<double>
Reading things like this post on Dan Guzman's blog , I wonder: why isn't
Assume that I have some HTML page, and a corresponding CSS file. I'd like
Possible Duplicate: Efficient way to implement singleton pattern in Java I was reading this
I have been reading about how read.table is not efficient for large data files.
What would be the most efficient method of reading a text file into a
Reading this question I found this as (note the quotation marks) code to solve
Reading over the responses to this question Disadvantages of Test Driven Development? I got
Reading through this question on multi-threaded javascript, I was wondering if there would be
I am reading through the presentation Building memory efficient Java applications , and saw

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.