Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I am reading the EJB 3 in Action book and I have the following question :
Is the POJO’s you write and annotate with @Entity and so on also a EJB entity type?
I don’t understand what JPA has to do with EJB. Isn’t JPA a own specification now? The entities are also contained in a own persistence container. They talk about EJB 3 Java Persistence API etc. but I don’t understand what entities has to do with EJB.
JPA has been designed to replace EJB2 entity beans, and has started as a part of the EJB3 specification.
Since it makes sense to also use JPA outside of an EJB container, it has now its own specification, but it’s still related to EJB3, since a compliant EJB3 container has to provide a JPA implementation, which integrates into the transaction handling of the container.