Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9167089
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T15:18:19+00:00 2026-06-17T15:18:19+00:00

I am reading various tutorials on the multiprocessing module in Python, and am having

  • 0

I am reading various tutorials on the multiprocessing module in Python, and am having trouble understanding why/when to call process.join(). For example, I stumbled across this example:

nums = range(100000)
nprocs = 4

def worker(nums, out_q):
    """ The worker function, invoked in a process. 'nums' is a
        list of numbers to factor. The results are placed in
        a dictionary that's pushed to a queue.
    """
    outdict = {}
    for n in nums:
        outdict[n] = factorize_naive(n)
    out_q.put(outdict)

# Each process will get 'chunksize' nums and a queue to put his out
# dict into
out_q = Queue()
chunksize = int(math.ceil(len(nums) / float(nprocs)))
procs = []

for i in range(nprocs):
    p = multiprocessing.Process(
            target=worker,
            args=(nums[chunksize * i:chunksize * (i + 1)],
                  out_q))
    procs.append(p)
    p.start()

# Collect all results into a single result dict. We know how many dicts
# with results to expect.
resultdict = {}
for i in range(nprocs):
    resultdict.update(out_q.get())

# Wait for all worker processes to finish
for p in procs:
    p.join()

print resultdict

From what I understand, process.join() will block the calling process until the process whose join method was called has completed execution. I also believe that the child processes which have been started in the above code example complete execution upon completing the target function, that is, after they have pushed their results to the out_q. Lastly, I believe that out_q.get() blocks the calling process until there are results to be pulled. Thus, if you consider the code:

resultdict = {}
for i in range(nprocs):
    resultdict.update(out_q.get())

# Wait for all worker processes to finish
for p in procs:
    p.join()

the main process is blocked by the out_q.get() calls until every single worker process has finished pushing its results to the queue. Thus, by the time the main process exits the for loop, each child process should have completed execution, correct?

If that is the case, is there any reason for calling the p.join() methods at this point? Haven’t all worker processes already finished, so how does that cause the main process to “wait for all worker processes to finish?” I ask mainly because I have seen this in multiple different examples, and I am curious if I have failed to understand something.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T15:18:21+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 3:18 pm

    Try to run this:

    import math
    import time
    from multiprocessing import Queue
    import multiprocessing
    
    def factorize_naive(n):
        factors = []
        for div in range(2, int(n**.5)+1):
            while not n % div:
                factors.append(div)
                n //= div
        if n != 1:
            factors.append(n)
        return factors
    
    nums = range(100000)
    nprocs = 4
    
    def worker(nums, out_q):
        """ The worker function, invoked in a process. 'nums' is a
            list of numbers to factor. The results are placed in
            a dictionary that's pushed to a queue.
        """
        outdict = {}
        for n in nums:
            outdict[n] = factorize_naive(n)
        out_q.put(outdict)
    
    # Each process will get 'chunksize' nums and a queue to put his out
    # dict into
    out_q = Queue()
    chunksize = int(math.ceil(len(nums) / float(nprocs)))
    procs = []
    
    for i in range(nprocs):
        p = multiprocessing.Process(
                target=worker,
                args=(nums[chunksize * i:chunksize * (i + 1)],
                      out_q))
        procs.append(p)
        p.start()
    
    # Collect all results into a single result dict. We know how many dicts
    # with results to expect.
    resultdict = {}
    for i in range(nprocs):
        resultdict.update(out_q.get())
    
    time.sleep(5)
    
    # Wait for all worker processes to finish
    for p in procs:
        p.join()
    
    print resultdict
    
    time.sleep(15)
    

    And open the task-manager. You should be able to see that the 4 subprocesses go in zombie state for some seconds before being terminated by the OS(due to the join calls):

    enter image description here

    With more complex situations the child processes could stay in zombie state forever(like the situation you was asking about in an other question), and if you create enough child-processes you could fill the process table causing troubles to the OS(which may kill your main process to avoid failures).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I spent all of yesterday reading various articles/tutorials on Hibernate and although I am
In the process of developing my own library, I've been reading various Ruby libraries
First program i'm writing while reading various Haskell tutorials gives me a Kind mis-match
I've been reading various python coding style guides, some answers on SO, etc. but
After reading through various tutorials [1] I still can't get my VirtualHost settings to
can anyone help? I have reading various blogs and it appears to include i18n
The Kindle has lit a personal interest in reading my various content on it,
after reading the cookbook and various Q&A here I am still a bit confused
After reading all sorts of Stackoverflow postings and various documentation including some on http://code.google.com/p/google-api-java-client/
Reading across difference lineage of CPU created by intel , many questions aroused in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.